To compare RAID10 with less in the stripe vs Raid6 with more.Īny thoughts on the best route to take here? which normally i always use at least 4-5 drives for Raid6. though maybe I dont need to have more than 3 drives in a stripe x 2 for this, to beat out say the performance of Raid6. Raid10, seems like a big suck of drive slots. also if sas3 is overkill on either of these, or maybe just for raid6, and the option of going with an enterprise sata drive array should be considered? saying that they cant guarantee other brands will work such as Areca (unless its the lsi-avago chipset). Supermicro was suggesting going with one of these 3 supermicro cards. SC846BE1C-R1K28B 4U, sas3/sata single expander this is what i've been spec'ing for a new build:ĬPU: E5-2650 v3 2.3 ghz x 2 (10 cores, 20 threads on each cpu) as many as 14 on one box alone (8 cores).
way beyond the old one box per core rule. These days these old boxes are seemingly dragging. these types of applications spread over 3 hosts. On one of the older boxes we run a virtual 16GB instance of sql server 2008, as well as application tiers for TFS, Sharepoint 2013 etc.
#SUPERMICRO RAID MONITOR PLUS#
In the past i've created raid6 arrays that hold all the servers on one box plus maybe another raid6 array for a passthrough disk to a virtual box as well. most of these servers are 5+ years old and only 8 core machines with sata enterprise drives. we have about 35 virtual machines spread over 3 hyper-v hosts at this point. At this point, we are building another hyper-v host server in our environment.
0 kommentar(er)
